Clinical Relevance
First level information About Clinical Relevance & List of Abbreviations |
▶ Found in patients with SLE, chronic autoimmune hepatitis or juvenile idiopathic arthritis ▶ If SLE is clinically suspected, it is recommended to perform a follow-up test for anti-dsDNA antibodies, alone or in combination with dsDNA/histone complexes (nucleosomes/chromatin); anti-dsDNA antibodies are included in the classification criteria for SLE (15, 16) ▶ If chronic autoimmune hepatitis or juvenile idiopathic arthritis is suspected, follow-up testing is not recommended because the respective autoantigens revealing the AC-1 pattern are not completely defined (17) Notes: Although autoantibodies to Topoisomerase I (formerly Scl-70) may be reported as nuclear homogeneous, they typically reveal a composite AC-29 HEp-2 IIFA pattern; as such, clinical suspicion of SSc may warrant follow-up testing for reactivity to this antigen (14, 18) Although AC-1 is the most prevalent pattern in chronic autoimmune hepatitis, other HEp-2 IIFA patterns may occur, but also for these patterns the autoantigens are not completely defined (19) |
First level information references |
14. Andrade LEC, Klotz W, Herold M, et al. International consensus on antinuclear antibody patterns: definition of the ac-29 pattern associated with antibodies to DNA topoisomerase I. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1783-8. 15. Conrad K, Schössler W, Hiepe F. Autoantibodies in systemic autoimmune diseases: a diagnostic reference. 2. 3th edn. Autoantigens autoantibodies autoimmunity, 2015. 16. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, et al. Derivation and validation of the systemic lupus international collaborating clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677-86. 17. Conrad K, Schössler W, Hiepe F. Autoantibodies in organ specific autoimmune diseases. a diagnostic reference. 8. 2th edn. Autoantigens autoantibodies autoimmunity, 2017. 18. Dellavance A, Gallindo C, Soares MG, et al. Redefining the Scl-70 indirect immunofluorescence pattern: autoantibodies to DNA topoisomerase I yield a specific compound immunofluorescence pattern. Rheumatology 2009;48:632-7. 19. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol 2015;63:971-1004. |
Second level information |
None |
Second level information references |
None
|
FAQ |
How best to recognize the metaphase plate? How to deal with just a “nuclear speckled” IFA report? In my practice I have followed patients with ANA findings, with a nuclear speckled pattern (without specifying whether fine/dense/coarse), in patients with very heterogeneous phenotypes, some with a clinical picture that suggests further investigation of systemic autoimmune disease (one patient with proximal muscle weakness and skin thickening) and others who represent only non-specific findings. In such situations, as a precaution, I request more specific autoantibodies. However, this pattern (nuclear speckled pattern) is not described by the "ICAP" and I am in doubt about which antigenic association it represents, even to guide which autoantibody may be present and which ones to look after. How to interpret this pattern? Does the lab describe it when it is not possible to "refine" such a conclusion? Could this be associated with deficiency in the methodology, sample, interpretation? Low titer anti-dsDNA serum negative by HEp-2 IFA? Question: Can I have a negative HEp-2 IFA result in a sample with positive Crithidia assay at 1/20? The negative HEp-2 IFA was confirmed with slides from different commercial brands. |