ICAP
AC-5 - Nuclear large/coarse speckled
Previous Nomenclature spliceosome/nuclear matrix
Description Coarse speckles across all nucleoplasm. The nucleoli may be stained or not stained. Mitotic cells (metaphase, anaphase, and telophase) have the chromatin mass not stained. e.g. anti-Sm, anti-U1 RNP
Antigen Association hnRNP, U1RNP, Sm, RNA polymerase III
Clinical Relevance
First level information
About Clinical Relevance & List of Abbreviations
Present in distinct systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), in particular systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM), SSc-IIM overlap syndrome, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), i.e., patients without a definite SARD diagnosis [1]
If SLE is clinically suspected, follow-up tests for Sm and U1RNP antibodies are recommended; these antigens are commonly included in routine extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) profile arrays; Sm antibodies are included in the classification criteria for SLE [2-5]
If SSc, MCTD, UCTD or IIM is clinically suspected, a follow-up test for U1RNP antibodies is recommended; U1RNP antibodies are present in a proportion of patients with SSc, UCTD, or IIM, and are a key parameter in the diagnostic criteria for MCTD [6-9]
In non-SARD individuals, the presence of the AC-5 pattern is not usually associated with autoantigens mentioned above, and with low antibody titer
First level information references
1.
Radin M, Cecchi I, Barinotti A, Wilson Jones G, Arbrile M, Miraglia P, Mahler M, Bentow C, et al. Identifying subsets of patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease: Results from a prospective, real-world experience using particle-based multi-analyte technology. Autoimmun Rev. 2023;22:103298
2.
Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, Brinks R, Mosca M, Ramsey-Goldman R, Smolen JS, Wofsy D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1400-12
3.
Satoh M, Fritzler MJ, Chan EKL. Anti-histone and anti-spliceosome antibodies. In: Tsokos GC, ed. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Basic, Applied and Clinical Aspects. 2nd ed: Academic Press; 2021:237-47
4.
Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcon GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR, Bruce IN, Isenberg D, et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-86
5.
Satoh M, Vazquez-Del Mercado M, Chan EKL. Clinical interpretation of antinuclear antibody tests in systemic rheumatic diseases. Mod Rheumatol. 2009;19:219-28
6.
van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, Matucci-Cerinic M, Naden RP, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1747-55
7.
Sharp GC, Irvin WS, Tan EM, Gould RG, Holman HR. Mixed connective tissue disease--an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA). Am J Med. 1972;52:148-59
8.
Choi MY, Satoh M, Fritzler MJ. Update on autoantibodies and related biomarkers in autoimmune inflammatory myopathies. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2023;35:383-94
9.
Wang G, McHugh NJ. An update on myositis autoantibodies and insights into pathogenesis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2025;43:364-71
Second level information
Occasionally, autoantibodies revealing the AC‐5 pattern are reactive with RNPs other than U1RNP, for instance U2RNP (associated with SSc‐IIM overlap syndrome) or U11/U12RNP (also known as RNP-C3, associated with SSc and overlap syndromes); these autoantibodies can be detected by immunoprecipitation or other solid phase immunoassays [10-12]
A systemic review on hnRNP antibodies shows studies with reactivities from hnRNP A1 to R in SARD and other diseases [13]. However, the use of these antibodies remains uncommon
 
Most reports describe these autoantibodies directly binding to specific antigens (i.e., antigen-specific immunoassays) and few actually shows correlations with the AC-5 pattern as such; specific immunoassay for these autoantibodies are currently not commercially available
Second level information references
10.
Mimori T, Hinterberger M, Pettersson I, Steitz JA. Autoantibodies to the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein in a patient with scleroderma-polymyositis overlap syndrome. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:560-5
11.
Fertig N, Domsic RT, Rodriguez-Reyna T, Kuwana M, Lucas M, Medsger TA, Jr., Feghali-Bostwick CA. Anti-U11/U12 RNP antibodies in systemic sclerosis: a new serologic marker associated with pulmonary fibrosis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:958-65
12.
Fritzler MJ, Bentow C, Beretta L, Palterer B, Perurena-Prieto J, Sanz-Martinez MT, Guillen-Del-Castillo A, Marin A, et al. Anti-U11/U12 Antibodies as a Rare but Important Biomarker in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13:1257
13.
Chen K, Luo M, Lv Y, Luo Z, Yang H. Undervalued and novel roles of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins in autoimmune diseases: Resurgence as potential biomarkers and targets. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2023;14:e1806
Last updated in August 2025
FAQ

How best to recognize the metaphase plate?
Question: As a new person learning HEp-2 IFA, is there any good tip to identify whether the metaphase plate is positive or negative?

How to deal with just a “nuclear speckled” IFA report?
In my practice I have followed patients with ANA findings, with a nuclear speckled pattern (without specifying whether fine/dense/coarse), in patients with very heterogeneous phenotypes, some with a clinical picture that suggests further investigation of systemic autoimmune disease (one patient with proximal muscle weakness and skin thickening) and others who represent only non-specific findings. In such situations, as a precaution, I request more specific autoantibodies. However, this pattern (nuclear speckled pattern) is not described by the "ICAP" and I am in doubt about which antigenic association it represents, even to guide which autoantibody may be present and which ones to look after. How to interpret this pattern? Does the lab describe it when it is not possible to "refine" such a conclusion? Could this be associated with deficiency in the methodology, sample, interpretation?
IFA pattern changed from coarse granular to homogeneous 
Question: The HEp-2 IFA pattern of a patient has changed from coarse granular to homogenous after 6 months. Is it possible?
 
 
Online since 19 May 2015